reviewdejogos.com.br Reviewdejogos.com.br

   
Review de Jogos - Review de jogos

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Reviewdejogos.com.br?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br ranks #7,399,856 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Reviewdejogos.com.br?

• 6.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Reviewdejogos.com.br

How many people visit Reviewdejogos.com.br each day?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br receives approximately 30 visitors and 47 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Reviewdejogos.com.br receive most of its visitors from?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br is mostly visited by people located in Brazil,Portugal.

How much Reviewdejogos.com.br can earn?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br should earn about $0.06/day from advertising revenue.

What is Reviewdejogos.com.br estimated value?

• Estimated value of Reviewdejogos.com.br is $55.35.

What IP addresses does Reviewdejogos.com.br resolve to?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br resolves to the IP addresses 185.211.7.142.

Where are Reviewdejogos.com.br servers located in?

• Reviewdejogos.com.br has servers located in São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323, Brazil.

reviewdejogos.com.br Profile

Title:Review de Jogos - Review de jogos Description:Review de Jogos traz conteúdos relacionado a jogos como Análises, críticas, artigos e notícias. Criado por quem joga, para quem joga.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does reviewdejogos.com.br use?

These are the technologies used at reviewdejogos.com.br. reviewdejogos.com.br has a total of 16 technologies installed in 16 different categories.
Page builders
Elementor Elementor
Advertising
Google AdSense Google AdSense
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Site Kit Site Kit
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
Hosting
Hostinger Hostinger
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed
Caching
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
WordPress plugins
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
RankMath SEO RankMath SEO
Site Kit Site Kit
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
SEO
RankMath SEO RankMath SEO
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

reviewdejogos.com.br Traffic Analysis

Reviewdejogos.com.br is ranked #7,399,856 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 30 visitors daily, generating a total of 47 pageviews. This equates to about 0.9K monthly visitors. Reviewdejogos.com.br traffic has increased by 485.87% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors30
326.09%
Monthly Visits0.9K
485.87%
Pages per Visit1.56
0.56%
Visit duration01:23
366.67%
Bounce Rate53.79%
78.01%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
30
Monthly Visits:
909
Pages per Visit:
1.56
Daily Pageviews:
47
Avg. visit duration:
01:23
Bounce rate:
53.79%
Global Reach:
6.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
539
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
392
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
894
HypeRank:
7,399,856
SEMrush Rank:
16,664,161
SimilarWeb Rank:
4,044,235
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
27.27%
Referral:
27.27%
Search:
45.45%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

692
OCT
155.2
NOV
0.9K
DEC

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Brazil 90.10%
 
Portugal 9.90%

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  reviewdejogos.com.br
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  16,664,161
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  9
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  3
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>
Last update was 33 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with reviewdejogos.com.br in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
785

Revenue report ▼

reviewdejogos.com.br would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $21.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $55.4.

How much would reviewdejogos.com.br make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.06
Monthly Revenue:
$1.80
Yearly Revenue:
$21.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Brazil 42$0.06
 
Portugal 5$0.00

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Brazil 3$0.00
 
Portugal 1$0.00

How much is reviewdejogos.com.br worth?

Website Value:
$55.4

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
reviewdejogos.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
reviewdejogos.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
reviewdejogos.com.br
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is reviewdejogos.com.br hosted? ▼

Reviewdejogos.com.br may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
185.211.7.142
ASN:
AS47583 
ISP:
Hostinger International Limited 
Server Location:
São Paulo
São Paulo, SP
01323
Brazil, BR
 

Other sites hosted on 185.211.7.142

How fast does reviewdejogos.com.br load? ▼

The average loading time of reviewdejogos.com.br is 913 ms. The Desktop speed index is 91 and mobile speed index is 99.
Average Load Time:
913 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 63% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 9% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 53% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 37% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.4s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 46% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 46% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 68% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 63% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 9% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 53% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 37% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.4s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 46% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 46% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 68% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 9% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 53% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 43% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 43%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 69% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 53% 37% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 3% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 53% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 43% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 43%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 14% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 69% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 53% 37% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 1.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint 1.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Does reviewdejogos.com.br use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on reviewdejogos.com.br are reduced by 76%.
reviewdejogos.com.br use br compression.
Original size: 181.24 KB
Compressed size: 42.22 KB
File reduced by: 139.01 KB (76%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. reviewdejogos.com.br supports HTTPS.
 reviewdejogos.com.br supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: reviewdejogos.com.br
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R12
Valid from: Dec 28 19:11:50 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 28 19:11:49 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R12
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 reviewdejogos.com.br supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.29
x-dns-prefetch-control: on
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
link: <https://reviewdejogos.com.br/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://reviewdejogos.com.br/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/9326>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: <https://reviewdejogos.com.br/>; rel=shortlink
etag: "35152-1767881369;br"
x-litespeed-cache: hit
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-length: 43237
date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 21:05:58 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
platform: hostinger
panel: hpanel
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
HINFO 3789

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on August 26, 2020 and will expire on August 26, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 23, 2024.
Domain Created:
2020-08-26
Domain Expires:
2025-08-26
Domain Updated:
2024-09-23
Domain Age:
5 years 5 months 20 days
Domain Owner:
Danilo Manzato Salmeron
WhoIs:
 

% Copyright (c) Nic.br - Use of this data is governed by the Use and
% Privacy Policy at https://registro.br/upp . Distribution,
% commercialization, reproduction, and use for advertising or similar
% purposes are expressly prohibited.
% 2025-03-03T20:56:06-03:00 - 108.178.0.234

domain:      reviewdejogos.com.br
owner:       Danilo Manzato Salmeron
ownerid:     ***.441.548-**
country:     BR
owner-c:     DAMSA93
tech-c:      DAMSA93
nserver:     wns26.hostgator.com.br
nsstat:      20250302 AA
nslastaa:    20250302
nserver:     wns27.hostgator.com.br
nsstat:      20250302 AA
nslastaa:    20250302
saci:        yes
created:     20200826 #21625495
changed:     20240923
expires:     20250826
status:      published

nic-hdl-br:  DAMSA93
person:      Danilo Manzato Salmeron
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20140710
changed:     20170406

% Security and mail abuse issues should also be addressed to cert.br,
% respectivelly to email and email
%
% whois.registro.br only accepts exact match queries for domains,
% registrants, contacts, tickets, providers, IPs, and ASNs.