balatutu.me Balatutu.me

   
Balatutu 線上看

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Balatutu.me?

8.8E-6% of global Internet users visit Balatutu.me

How many people visit Balatutu.me each day?

• Balatutu.me receives approximately 432 visitors and 3,372 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Balatutu.me receive most of its visitors from?

• Balatutu.me is mostly visited by people located in Taiwan,Hong Kong,United States.

How much Balatutu.me can earn?

• Balatutu.me should earn about $2.16/day from advertising revenue.

What is Balatutu.me estimated value?

• Estimated value of Balatutu.me is $2,195.73.

What IP addresses does Balatutu.me resolve to?

• Balatutu.me resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3036::6815:223, 104.21.2.35.

balatutu.me Profile

Title:balatutu 線上看
Description:新版balatutu影城追劇首選,簡潔介面VIP享受,全站順暢無廣告線上影片隨您看,輕鬆隨時隨地收看最新影劇資訊! 涵蓋電影、電視劇、動漫、綜藝、陸劇、韓劇、美劇、台劇、日劇、BL、泰劇!!
Tags:
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV

What technologies does balatutu.me use?

These are the technologies used at balatutu.me. balatutu.me has a total of 5 technologies installed in 4 different categories.

balatutu.me Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 432 visitors daily, generating a total of 3.4K pageviews. This equates to about 13.1K monthly visitors. Balatutu.me traffic has decreased by 29.81% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors432
137.62%
Monthly Visits13.1K
29.81%
Pages per Visit7.81
160.27%
Visit duration02:44
25.84%
Bounce Rate27.48%
33.95%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
432
Monthly Visits:
13,090
Pages per Visit:
7.81
Daily Pageviews:
3,372
Avg. visit duration:
02:44
Bounce rate:
27.48%
Global Reach:
8.8E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
53,169
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
34,345
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
13,078
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
37,145,591
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,047,112
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
70.69%
Referral:
4.51%
Search:
24.01%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0.79%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
54.57%
Mobile:
45.43%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

11.2K
DEC
18.6K
JAN
13.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Taiwan 72.81%
 
Hong Kong 14.56%
 
United States 6.06%
 
Malaysia 5.88%
 
Japan 0.69%

Which sites are competitors to balatutu.me?

Websites similar to balatutu.me are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 26 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with balatutu.me in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  balatutu.me
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  37,145,591
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $2.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $64.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $788.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.2K.

How much would balatutu.me make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.16
Monthly Revenue:
$64.80
Yearly Revenue:
$788.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 204$0.99
 
Taiwan 2,455$0.56
 
Hong Kong 491$0.54
 
Malaysia 198$0.06
 
Japan 23$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.33
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$9.80
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$119.27
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
495
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
14,858
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
180,774

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 37$0.18
 
Taiwan 393$0.09
 
Hong Kong 49$0.05
 
Malaysia 16$0.00
 
Japan 1$0.00

How much is balatutu.me worth?

Website Value:
$2.2K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
balatutu.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
balatutu.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
balatutu.me
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is balatutu.me hosted?

Balatutu.me may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does balatutu.me load?

The average loading time of balatutu.me is 1627 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
1627 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 68% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.0s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 64% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 30% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)42ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 29% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)98ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.6s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)91ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact

Does balatutu.me use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on balatutu.me are reduced by 84%.
balatutu.me use br compression.
Original size: 143.69 KB
Compressed size: 22.47 KB
File reduced by: 121.21 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. balatutu.me supports HTTPS.
 balatutu.me supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: balatutu.me
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 22 18:24:21 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 20 19:22:02 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 balatutu.me supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:48:43 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cf-ray: 9269da8d2ba95a04-IAD
server: cloudflare
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: br
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
cache-control: no-cache
pragma: no-cache
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=VAlralrtxXWYqki8AFuVAYqUYI%2BNBGuxrvizzFeetHvtbDCr%2BXYs4rcMZ6lKHCoSo%2BYXla5aTnfMy7HH%2Bz9eQCWJDVha9YeruILmSQnaQQ4X3tfot%2BeiC7qF99M5Yw%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=fi9h4eqfkruv22tnrit84idocl; Path=/
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=22393&min_rtt=17363&rtt_var=13704&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3410&recv_bytes=891&delivery_rate=166791&cwnd=34&unsent_bytes=0&cid=0efc15dd12ea4725&ts=1508&x=0"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3034::ac43:80aa 206
AAAA 2606:4700:3036::6815:223 206
A 172.67.128.170 206
A 104.21.2.35 206
NS melinda.ns.cloudflare.com 3506
NS alberto.ns.cloudflare.com 3506
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 27, 2021 and will expire on July 27, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NameSilo, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 17, 2025.
Domain Created:
2021-07-27
Domain Expires:
2025-07-27
Domain Updated:
2025-03-17
Domain Age:
3 years 8 months 26 days
Domain Registrar:
NameSilo, LLC
Domain Owner:
See PrivacyGuardian.org
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: balatutu.me
Registry Domain ID: e97d128021724cb6bbd146dcf1d341e4-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namesilo.com
Registrar URL: https://www.namesilo.com/
Updated Date: 2025-03-17T07:00:00Z
Creation Date: 2021-07-27T07:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-07-27T07:00:00Z
Registrar: NameSilo, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 1479
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4805240066
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Domain Administrator
Registrant Organization: See PrivacyGuardian.org
Registrant Street: 1928 E. Highland Ave. Ste F104 PMB# 255
Registrant City: Phoenix
Registrant State/Province: AZ
Registrant Postal Code: 85016
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.3478717726
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Domain Administrator
Admin Organization: See PrivacyGuardian.org
Admin Street: 1928 E. Highland Ave. Ste F104 PMB# 255
Admin City: Phoenix
Admin State/Province: AZ
Admin Postal Code: 85016
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.3478717726
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Domain Administrator
Tech Organization: See PrivacyGuardian.org
Tech Street: 1928 E. Highland Ave. Ste F104 PMB# 255
Tech City: Phoenix
Tech State/Province: AZ
Tech Postal Code: 85016
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.3478717726
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ALBERTO.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: MELINDA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-26T07:00:00Z