asingular.com.br Asingular.com.br

   

Domain Summary

What is Asingular.com.br estimated value?

• Estimated value of Asingular.com.br is $1.66.

What IP addresses does Asingular.com.br resolve to?

• Asingular.com.br resolves to the IP addresses 173.236.142.117.

Where are Asingular.com.br servers located in?

• Asingular.com.br has servers located in United States.

asingular.com.br Profile

Description:the owner of this domain has not yet uploaded their website.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does asingular.com.br use?

These are the technologies used at asingular.com.br. asingular.com.br has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server

asingular.com.br Traffic Analysis

Asingular.com.br traffic has decreased by 73.35% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors n/a
62.03%
Monthly Visits n/a
73.35%
Pages per Visit1.00
280.05%
Visit duration26:52
515.27%
Bounce Rate32.88%
87.69%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
 n/a
Monthly Visits:
n/a
Pages per Visit:
1.00
Daily Pageviews:
n/a
Avg. visit duration:
26:52
Bounce rate:
32.88%
Global Reach:
 n/a
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
178
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
60
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
11
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
23,792,652
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
98.88%
Referral:
1.12%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

179
DEC
0
JAN
0
FEB
Last update was 262 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with asingular.com.br in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
141,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  asingular.com.br
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  23,792,652
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
asingular.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
asingular.com.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
asingular.com.br
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is asingular.com.br hosted? ▼

Asingular.com.br may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
173.236.142.117
ASN:
AS26347 
ISP:
New Dream Network, LLC 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 173.236.142.117

How fast does asingular.com.br load? ▼

The average loading time of asingular.com.br is 86 ms. The Desktop speed index is 89 and mobile speed index is 75.
Average Load Time:
86 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

89
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)862ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)18ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 2.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 1.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

75
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 51% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 51% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.0s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 39% 35% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 35% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 24%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)143ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.4s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 55% 27% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

JavaScript execution time  
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time
Avoid long main-thread tasks  
Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay. Learn how to avoid long main-thread tasks
Tasks  
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 4.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Contentful Paint 4.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 4.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Diagnostics  
Collection of useful page vitals.
Minimizes main-thread work  
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to minimize main-thread work
Time to Interactive 4.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does asingular.com.br use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on asingular.com.br are reduced by 17%.
asingular.com.br use gzip compression.
Original size: 229 B
Compressed size: 189 B
File reduced by: 40 B (17%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. asingular.com.br supports HTTPS.
 asingular.com.br supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.asingular.com.br
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 1 14:08:11 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 2 14:08:10 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 asingular.com.br supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
last-modified: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:20:57 GMT
etag: "e5-630195756c494-gzip"
accept-ranges: bytes
cache-control: max-age=600
expires: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:25:02 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
content-encoding: gzip
content-length: 189
content-type: text/html
date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:15:02 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 300
Mname ns1.dreamhost.com
Rname hostmaster.dreamhost.com
Serial Number 2025021601
Refresh 18687
Retry 600
Expire 1814400
Minimum TTL 300
TXT v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all 300
MX mx2.dreamhost.com 300
MX mx1.dreamhost.com 300
A 173.236.142.117 251
NS ns3.dreamhost.com 3551
NS ns2.dreamhost.com 3551
NS ns1.dreamhost.com 3551

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 14, 2014 and will expire on December 14, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Carlos Eduardo. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 11, 2025.
Domain Created:
2014-12-14
Domain Expires:
2025-12-14
Domain Updated:
2025-01-11
Domain Age:
10 years 19 days
Domain Registrar:
Carlos Eduardo
Domain Owner:
Nathan Albertassi
WhoIs:
 

% Copyright (c) Nic.br - Use of this data is governed by the Use and
% Privacy Policy at https://registro.br/upp . Distribution,
% commercialization, reproduction, and use for advertising or similar
% purposes are expressly prohibited.
% 2025-03-14T14:15:51-03:00 - 108.178.0.234

domain:      asingular.com.br
owner:       Nathan Albertassi
ownerid:     ***.830.757-**
country:     BR
owner-c:     NAALB7
tech-c:      CAEDU144
nserver:     ns1.dreamhost.com
nsstat:      20250311 AA
nslastaa:    20250311
nserver:     ns3.dreamhost.com
nsstat:      20250311 AA
nslastaa:    20250311
saci:        yes
created:     20141214 #13654945
changed:     20250111
expires:     20251214
status:      published

nic-hdl-br:  NAALB7
person:      Nathan Albertassi
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20120529
changed:     20240222

nic-hdl-br:  CAEDU144
person:      Carlos Eduardo
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20101103
changed:     20200930

% Security and mail abuse issues should also be addressed to cert.br,
% respectivelly to email and email
%
% whois.registro.br only accepts exact match queries for domains,
% registrants, contacts, tickets, providers, IPs, and ASNs.